|−|GOST R 50739- 95 says nothing about number of passes and random data. [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 11:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC) |+|
| || |
|−|I may have been misinformed, my russian is non existant. Would you know where to get documentation? [[User:Fsck|Fsck]] 21:14, 4 July 2008 ( UTC) |+|
, to ? (, , with -). [[User:|]] :, ()
|−|:: Gostechcommission defines following requirements in management directive: computer-based systems with protection class 3А, 2А, 1А, 1Б, 1В or 1Г (Russian letters) should wipe external memory and RAM with two passes of random data (www.internet- law.ru/standarts/safety/gtk009.doc). [[User: .FUF| .FUF]] 20: 34, 5 July 2008 ( UTC) |+|
Revision as of 18:49, 28 December 2011
How are they more valuable than mount -o ro?
To add value, wouldn't a write-blocker need to be infallible, then *proven* to be infallible? (That is, proven to be as such, within the margin demonstrated by proving compliance with RTCA/DO-178B using Criticality Level 1). johnc 17:49, 28 December 2011 (PST)